Study finds UK family courts often ignore children's voices

Children in England’s private family law proceedings are at risk of significant mental and physical harm, a new study has found, after the University of Manchester partnered with the SHERA Research Group and The Survivor Family Network to examine the impact of child exclusion. The research, which surveyed hundreds of children who had recently been involved in divorce or separation disputes, revealed that when their views are ignored or dismissed by legal professionals, they experience heightened anxiety, depression, and, in some cases, physical symptoms such as headaches or sleep disturbances.

The study highlights that the current procedural framework in private family law often prioritises the interests of parents and legal advisers over those of the children, leaving young people with little opportunity to express their concerns or preferences. Researchers noted that this lack of participation not only undermines the children’s sense of agency but also contributes to longer‑term psychological distress and poorer health outcomes. The findings echo earlier reports by child‑rights advocates that children’s voices must be central to any decision that affects their lives.

In response, the University of Manchester team has called for a review of the statutory guidelines governing private family law, urging the introduction of mandatory child‑participation mechanisms and training for attorneys and mediators on child‑centred practice. The research team hopes that these reforms will reduce the adverse health impacts identified and ensure that children’s perspectives are formally recognised in future proceedings.