African Union faces challenges in Sudan peace mission

The African Union (AU) has reaffirmed its commitment to advancing a political settlement in Sudan, where a protracted conflict between the Sudanese Armed Forces and the Rapid Support Forces has devastated civilian life and displaced millions. In recent weeks the AU’s Peace and Security Council has pushed for the deployment of a joint African peacekeeping force, urging all parties to honor the August cease‑fire agreement and to engage in inclusive dialogue under the auspices of the AU’s mediation team led by former Tanzanian President Jakaya Kikwete. The union’s efforts are being coordinated with the United Nations, the Intergovernmental Authority on Development and regional stakeholders, aiming to secure humanitarian corridors and to lay the groundwork for a transitional governance framework.

However, the AU’s initiative faces significant obstacles stemming from deep battlefield stalemates and divergent diplomatic positions among its member states. Countries such as Egypt and Ethiopia have expressed reservations about the scope and command structure of a potential African force, while others, including South Sudan and Kenya, advocate for a more robust deployment to protect civilians. These internal divisions have slowed consensus on funding, rules of engagement and the timeline for troop contributions, complicating the union’s ability to present a unified front. Analysts note that bridging these gaps will be essential for the AU to translate its diplomatic overtures into concrete action and to sustain momentum toward a durable peace in Sudan.